Sending hope and best wishes to you and your loved ones. Jonread more >
When is humor outrageous enough to appear unreasonable? And how does that affect a statement’s defamatory nature? In this post we’ll look into these questions, the nature of defamatory opinions, and a few cases that demonstrate recent changes in media and defamation law the Digital Age.
1988 – Defamation Via Parody (Hustler Magazine v. Falwell)
In Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, the Supreme Court ruled that a parody advertisement claiming Jerry Falwell had engaged in an incestuous act with his mother in an outhouse, while false (and deeply disturbing), could not allow Falwell to win damages for emotional distress. Falwell was…read more >
Today we'll take a quick look at three cases that heavily impacted the way defamation law evolved from the turn of the 20th Century all the way through the mid-1970s.
1931 – The Essence of Censorship (Near v. Minnesota)
1931 – In Near v. Minnesota, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a permanent injunction against the publisher of The Saturday Press. The paper claimed that Jewish gangs were “practically ruling” Minneapolis, aided by the chief of police. Corruption at its finest.
The Court ruled that the Minnesota statute granting state judges the power to…read more >